RH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Leslie's, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to RH's net margin of -56.39%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Leslie's, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

RH has a consensus price target of $160.53, signalling upside risk potential of 62.55%. On the other hand Leslie's, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.20 which suggests that it could grow by 62.96%. Given that Leslie's, Inc. has higher upside potential than RH, analysts believe Leslie's, Inc. is more attractive than RH.

RH has a beta of 2.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.219% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslie's, Inc. has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.494%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leslie's, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leslie's, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $842.6M, which are larger than Leslie's, Inc. quarterly revenues of $147.1M. RH's net income of $28.8M is higher than Leslie's, Inc.'s net income of -$83M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Leslie's, Inc.'s PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 0.65x versus 0.07x for Leslie's, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to RH's net margin of 3.44%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Tesla, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

RH has a consensus price target of $160.53, signalling upside risk potential of 62.55%. On the other hand Tesla, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $418.83 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Tesla, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Tesla, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.219% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla, Inc. has a beta of 1.913, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.3%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $842.6M, which are smaller than Tesla, Inc. quarterly revenues of $24.9B. RH's net income of $28.8M is lower than Tesla, Inc.'s net income of $856M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Tesla, Inc.'s PE ratio is 363.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 0.65x versus 14.54x for Tesla, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wayfair, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to RH's net margin of -3.48%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Wayfair, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

RH has a consensus price target of $160.53, signalling upside risk potential of 62.55%. On the other hand Wayfair, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $105.07 which suggests that it could grow by 39.63%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Wayfair, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Wayfair, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.219% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wayfair, Inc. has a beta of 3.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.135%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wayfair, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wayfair, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RH quarterly revenues are $842.6M, which are smaller than Wayfair, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. RH's net income of $28.8M is higher than Wayfair, Inc.'s net income of -$116M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Wayfair, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 0.65x versus 0.78x for Wayfair, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a net margin of 3.42% compared to RH's net margin of 15.61%. RH's return on equity of -- beat Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s return on equity of 51.32%.

RH has a consensus price target of $160.53, signalling upside risk potential of 62.55%. On the other hand Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $204.53 which suggests that it could grow by 13.39%. Given that RH has higher upside potential than Williams-Sonoma, Inc., analysts believe RH is more attractive than Williams-Sonoma, Inc..

RH has a beta of 2.102, which suggesting that the stock is 110.219% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams-Sonoma, Inc. has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.421%.

RH has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. RH pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. pays out 29.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RH quarterly revenues are $842.6M, which are smaller than Williams-Sonoma, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4B. RH's net income of $28.8M is lower than Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s net income of $368M. Notably, RH's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.87x while Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RH is 0.65x versus 2.81x for Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.